Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CAIntact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA
VS
Marsh McLennan AgencyMarsh McLennan Agency
Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA

Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA

700 University Ave, Toronto, CA

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Welcome to Intact Broker. As Canada’s largest provider of home, auto and business insurance, we are here to help people, businesses and society prosper in good times and be resilient in bad times. This page is your go-to hub for broker tools, ideas and support. Togethe...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Marsh McLennan Agency

Marsh McLennan Agency

360 Hamilton Ave, White Plains, US

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.marshmma.com/
760/1000Fair

Marsh McLennan Agency, a business of Marsh (NYSE: MRSH), is a leading provider of business insurance, employee health & benefits, retirement & wealth, and private client insurance solutions across the US and Canada. Marsh is a global leader in risk, reinsurance and capi...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:14,372
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA

Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marsh McLennan Agency

Marsh McLennan Agency

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh McLennan Agency in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marsh McLennan Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh McLennan Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA

Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Marsh McLennan Agency

Marsh McLennan Agency

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAR401072525

FAQ

Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Marsh McLennan Agency company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA and Marsh McLennan Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA and Marsh McLennan Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA or Marsh McLennan Agency ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA or Marsh McLennan Agency ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA and Marsh McLennan Agency, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA and Marsh McLennan Agency, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2