Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CAIntact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA
VS
Generali ItaliaGenerali Italia
Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA

Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA

700 University Ave, Toronto, CA

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Welcome to Intact Broker. As Canada’s largest provider of home, auto and business insurance, we are here to help people, businesses and society prosper in good times and be resilient in bad times. This page is your go-to hub for broker tools, ideas and support. Togethe...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Generali Italia

Generali Italia

IT

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.generali.it
773/1000Fair

Generali Italia è la grande realtà assicurativa nata dalla fusione di Generali, Ina Assitalia, Toro, Lloyd Italico e Augusta. Dall’unione di persone e competenze che hanno fatto la storia dell’assicurazione in Italia, è nata una Compagnia con radici solide che guarda al...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:10,178
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA

Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Generali Italia

Generali Italia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Generali Italia in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Generali Italia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Generali Italia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA

Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Generali Italia

Generali Italia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Generali Italia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Generali Italia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Generali Italia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Generali Italia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Generali Italia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Generali Italia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Generali Italia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Generali Italia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Generali Italia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Generali Italia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA company and Generali Italia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA and Generali Italia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA and Generali Italia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA or Generali Italia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA or Generali Italia ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA and Generali Italia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Intact Broker CA | Intact Représentant CA and Generali Italia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1