Comparison Overview

Intact

VS

Zurich Insurance

Intact

700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5G 0A1
Last Update: 2025-12-09

We created a purpose-driven company based on Values and a belief that insurance is about people, not things. This is the foundation on which we have built Intact and it lives every day through our purpose, Values, what we aim to achieve and how. ___ Nous sommes là pour aider les gens, les entreprises et la société à aller de l’avant dans les bons moments et à être résilients dans le moments difficiles. Notre entreprise est basée sur des valeurs et la conviction que l’assurance doit d’abord s’intéresser aux personnes, et non aux choses. C’est dans cette optique que nous avons bâti Intact et ça se reflète chaque jour dans notre raison d’être, nos valeurs, nos facteurs de succès en leadership, notre promesse aux employés, nos objectifs et notre stratégie.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 20,361
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Zurich Insurance

Mythenquai 2, Zurich, Zurich, CH, 8002
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Zurich Insurance Group (Zurich) is a leading global multi-line insurer founded more than 150 years ago, which has grown into a business serving more than 75 million customers in more than 200 countries and territories, while delivering industry-leading total shareholder returns. Our customers include individuals, small businesses, and mid-sized and large companies, as well as multinational corporations. The Group is headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland, where it was founded in 1872. ONE TEAM, ONE PURPOSE We are Zurich, one global company, with one mission, one ambition, one set of shared values and a clear commitment to our stakeholders: our customers, our people, our shareholders, and the communities in which we live and work. You can find our community guidelines on: https://www.zurich.com/services/social-media

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 41,564
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intact.jpeg
Intact
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zurich-insurance-company-ltd.jpeg
Zurich Insurance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Intact
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zurich Insurance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intact in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zurich Insurance in 2025.

Incident History — Intact (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zurich Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zurich Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intact.jpeg
Intact
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zurich-insurance-company-ltd.jpeg
Zurich Insurance
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2021
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Zurich Insurance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Intact company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Zurich Insurance company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Intact company has not reported any.

In the current year, Zurich Insurance company and Intact company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zurich Insurance company nor Intact company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Zurich Insurance company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Intact company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Zurich Insurance company nor Intact company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Intact company nor Zurich Insurance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Intact nor Zurich Insurance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Zurich Insurance company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Intact company.

Zurich Insurance company employs more people globally than Intact company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Intact nor Zurich Insurance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Intact nor Zurich Insurance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Intact nor Zurich Insurance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Intact nor Zurich Insurance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Intact nor Zurich Insurance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Intact nor Zurich Insurance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N