Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Insure Our EventInsure Our Event
VS
AAA-The Auto Club GroupAAA-The Auto Club Group
Insure Our Event

Insure Our Event

8 Airport West, Lancaster Way, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS19 7ZA, GB

Last Update: 04/06/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

We’re specialists within the event insurance industry and experts at providing all round insurance protection for businesses across the UK. Whatever the event and size, we’ll be able to tailor an insurance package to fit. You can submit an online form if you’d like to ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AAA-The Auto Club Group

AAA-The Auto Club Group

1 Auto Club Drive, Dearborn, MI, US, 48126

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://aaa.com
732/1000Moderate

AAA - The Auto Club Group (ACG) is the second largest AAA club in North America, serving more than 13+ million members across 14 U.S. states, the province of Quebec, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. For over 100 years, AAA has provided safety, security, and pe...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:11,003
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Insure Our Event

Insure Our Event

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AAA-The Auto Club Group

AAA-The Auto Club Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Insure Our Event in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AAA-The Auto Club Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Insure Our Event (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Insure Our Event cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AAA-The Auto Club Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AAA-The Auto Club Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Insure Our Event

Insure Our Event

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AAA-The Auto Club Group

AAA-The Auto Club Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE325072525

FAQ

Between Insure Our Event company and AAA-The Auto Club Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Insure Our Event company and AAA-The Auto Club Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Insure Our Event company and AAA-The Auto Club Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Insure Our Event company and AAA-The Auto Club Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Insure Our Event company and AAA-The Auto Club Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Insure Our Event company and AAA-The Auto Club Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Insure Our Event company and AAA-The Auto Club Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Insure Our Event company and AAA-The Auto Club Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Insure Our Event company and AAA-The Auto Club Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Insure Our Event company and AAA-The Auto Club Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Insure Our Event company and AAA-The Auto Club Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Insure Our Event and AAA-The Auto Club Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Insure Our Event and AAA-The Auto Club Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Insure Our Event or AAA-The Auto Club Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Insure Our Event or AAA-The Auto Club Group ?
Between Insure Our Event and AAA-The Auto Club Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Insure Our Event and AAA-The Auto Club Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58281
SUMMARY

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-10660
SUMMARY

The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-61870
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.4
CVE-2026-61861
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-61858
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8