Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Insurance Innovators USAInsurance Innovators USA
VS
MapfreMapfre
Insurance Innovators USA

Insurance Innovators USA

Nashville, US

Last Update: 01/02/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Designed by insurance carriers, for insurance carriers, Insurance Innovators USA helps you drive business growth. Come to Nashville this May to meet fellow senior insurance leaders and share the latest innovation thinking. Hear expert opinions, spot important trends and...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mapfre

Mapfre

Carretera de Pozuelo, 52, Majadahonda, Community of Madrid, ES, 28220

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mapfre.com
785/1000Fair

At Mapfre, we’ve spent more than 90 years supporting people and businesses around the world, taking care of what matters most to them. We offer insurance, financial, and service solutions that evolve with you. Our experience and commitment, combined with a constant focu...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:37,331
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Insurance Innovators USA

Insurance Innovators USA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mapfre

Mapfre

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Insurance Innovators USA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mapfre in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Insurance Innovators USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Insurance Innovators USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mapfre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mapfre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Insurance Innovators USA

Insurance Innovators USA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mapfre

Mapfre

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Insurance Innovators USA company and Mapfre company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Insurance Innovators USA company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Insurance Innovators USA company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Insurance Innovators USA company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Insurance Innovators USA company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Insurance Innovators USA company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Insurance Innovators USA company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Insurance Innovators USA company and Mapfre company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Insurance Innovators USA company and Mapfre company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Insurance Innovators USA company and Mapfre company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Insurance Innovators USA company and Mapfre company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Insurance Innovators USA and Mapfre, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Insurance Innovators USA and Mapfre, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Insurance Innovators USA or Mapfre ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Insurance Innovators USA or Mapfre ?
Between Insurance Innovators USA and Mapfre, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Insurance Innovators USA and Mapfre, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA