Comparison Overview
Grupo Insud

Grupo Insud
Paraguay 1535, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, C1061ABC, AR
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Somos un conjunto de empresas de capitales argentinos, altamente diversificado, y con presencia global. Comenzamos trabajando en la industria farmacéutica, nuestra actividad principal. Hoy, nos consolidamos también en áreas como los emprendimientos agroforestales; las i...

Tata Group
Bombay House, Mumbai, 400001, IN
Last Update: 28/06/2026
Founded by Jamsetji Tata in 1868, the Tata group is a global enterprise headquartered in India. The group operates in more than 100 countries across six continents with a mission 'To improve the quality of life of the communities we serve globally, through long-term sta...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Grupo Insud







Tata Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Grupo Insud in 2026.
Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)
Tata Group has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Grupo Insud (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Grupo Insud cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tata Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tata Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Grupo Insud

Tata Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.