Comparison Overview
Instrumentarium

Instrumentarium
1273 rue Saint-Louis, Terrebonne, Québec J6W 1K6, CA
Last Update: 01/02/2026
Since 1977, Instrumentarium has been the benchmark in the field of surgical instruments. We offer an impressive range of products, for use in ophthalmology, otorhinolaryngology, laparoscopy, plastic surgery and many other types of surgery. We’ve built our reputation on...

Danaher Corporation
2200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, 20037, US
Last Update: 11/09/2026
Danaher is a leading global life sciences and diagnostics innovator, committed to accelerating the power of science and technology to improve human health. We partner with customers across the globe to help them solve their most complex challenges, architecting solution...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Instrumentarium







Danaher Corporation






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Instrumentarium in 2026.
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Danaher Corporation in 2026.
Incident History - Instrumentarium (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Instrumentarium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Danaher Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Danaher Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Instrumentarium

Danaher Corporation
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.