Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Instituut BlankestijnInstituut Blankestijn
VS
Toronto District School BoardToronto District School Board
Instituut Blankestijn

Instituut Blankestijn

Oudegracht 189 Utrecht, 3511 NE, NL

Last Update: 25/04/2026

View Profile
833/1000Good

ONDERWIJS DAT PAST BIJ HET TALENT DAT SCHUILT IN UW KIND Instituut Blankestijn is een bewust kleinschalige, particuliere school in het centrum van Utrecht waar leerlingen uit heel Nederland komen om intensief les te krijgen van toegewijde en vakbekwame docenten. Al m...

NAICS:611
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:11-50
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Toronto District School Board

Toronto District School Board

5050 Yonge Street, Toronto, M2N 5N8, CA

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tdsb.on.ca
713/1000Moderate

The Toronto District School Board (TDSB) is the largest and one of the most diverse school boards in Canada, and recognized by Forbes and Statista as one of Canada's Best Employers for Diversity for 2023. We serve more than 239,000 students in 582 schools throughout Tor...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:11,546
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Instituut Blankestijn

Instituut Blankestijn

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Toronto District School Board

Toronto District School Board

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Instituut Blankestijn in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Toronto District School Board in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Instituut Blankestijn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Instituut Blankestijn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Toronto District School Board (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toronto District School Board cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Instituut Blankestijn

Instituut Blankestijn

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Toronto District School Board

Toronto District School Board

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
POW1393613112025

FAQ

Between Instituut Blankestijn company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Instituut Blankestijn company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Instituut Blankestijn company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Instituut Blankestijn company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Instituut Blankestijn company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Instituut Blankestijn company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Instituut Blankestijn company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Instituut Blankestijn company and Toronto District School Board company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Instituut Blankestijn company and Toronto District School Board company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Instituut Blankestijn company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Instituut Blankestijn company and Toronto District School Board company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Instituut Blankestijn and Toronto District School Board, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Instituut Blankestijn and Toronto District School Board, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Instituut Blankestijn or Toronto District School Board ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Instituut Blankestijn or Toronto District School Board ?
Between Instituut Blankestijn and Toronto District School Board, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Instituut Blankestijn and Toronto District School Board, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA