Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Instituto Acende BrasilInstituto Acende Brasil
VS
WeatherfordWeatherford
Instituto Acende Brasil

Instituto Acende Brasil

Rua Joaquim Floriano 466 Ed Corp 501, São Paulo, 04534004, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
635/1000Poor

O Instituto Acende Brasil é um Centro de Estudos voltado ao desenvolvimento de ações e projetos para aumentar o grau de Transparência e Sustentabilidade do Setor Elétrico Brasileiro. Baseados em números e fatos, pensamos e analisamos o setor com a lente de longo prazo, ...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:15
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Weatherford

Weatherford

Dublin, IE

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.weatherford.com
767/1000Fair

Weatherford International plc (Nasdaq: WFRD) is a leading global energy services company. Operating in approximately 75 countries, the Company answers the challenges of the energy industry with its global talent network of approximately 17,000 team members and approxima...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:29,363
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Instituto Acende Brasil

Instituto Acende Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Weatherford

Weatherford

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

Instituto Acende Brasil has 57.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Weatherford in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Instituto Acende Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Instituto Acende Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Weatherford (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Weatherford cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Instituto Acende Brasil

Instituto Acende Brasil

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452
Weatherford

Weatherford

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Instituto Acende Brasil company and Weatherford company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Instituto Acende Brasil company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Instituto Acende Brasil company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Instituto Acende Brasil company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Instituto Acende Brasil company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Instituto Acende Brasil company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Instituto Acende Brasil company and Weatherford company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Instituto Acende Brasil company and Weatherford company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Instituto Acende Brasil company and Weatherford company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Instituto Acende Brasil company and Weatherford company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Instituto Acende Brasil company and Weatherford company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Instituto Acende Brasil and Weatherford, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Instituto Acende Brasil and Weatherford, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Instituto Acende Brasil or Weatherford ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Instituto Acende Brasil or Weatherford ?
Between Instituto Acende Brasil and Weatherford, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Instituto Acende Brasil and Weatherford, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2