Comparison Overview
Institutions for Open Societies (Utrecht University)

Institutions for Open Societies (Utrecht University)
Utrecht, 3512BS, NL
Last Update: 03/04/2026
The ideal of 'the open society' is one of the most inspiring societal notions of our time. The promise of the law, democracy and equity has inspired major societal transformations. However, the core institutions of an open society cannot be taken for granted. Continuou...

Politecnico di Milano
Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, Milano, IT
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Politecnico Milano is a scientific-technological university which trains engineers, architects and designers. The University has always focused on the quality and innovation of its teaching and research, developing a fruitful relationship with business and productive w...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Institutions for Open Societies (Utrecht University)







Politecnico di Milano






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Institutions for Open Societies (Utrecht University) in 2026.
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Politecnico di Milano in 2026.
Incident History - Institutions for Open Societies (Utrecht University) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Institutions for Open Societies (Utrecht University) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Politecnico di Milano (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Politecnico di Milano cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Institutions for Open Societies (Utrecht University)

Politecnico di Milano
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.