Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Department of Informatics at Lund UniversityThe Department of Informatics at Lund University
VS
NielsenIQNielsenIQ
The Department of Informatics at Lund University

The Department of Informatics at Lund University

Ole Römers väg 6, Lund, undefined, 223 63, SE

Last Update: 14/03/2026

View Profile

The Department of Informatics coordinates the Bachelor's and Master's programs in Information Systems at the School of Economics and Management in Lund. Our research has a broad focus on digital transformation, encompassing both the transformation process and its impact...

NAICS:519
NAICS Definition:Other Information Services
Employees:8
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NielsenIQ

NielsenIQ

200 W Jackson Blvd, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60606

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://niq.com/
809/1000Good

NielsenIQ (NIQ) is the world’s leading consumer intelligence company, delivering the most complete understanding of consumer buying behavior and revealing new pathways to growth. NIQ combined with GfK in 2023, bringing together the two industry leaders with unparallele...

NAICS:519
NAICS Definition:Other Information Services
Employees:28,579
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Department of Informatics at Lund University

The Department of Informatics at Lund University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NielsenIQ

NielsenIQ

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Department of Informatics at Lund University in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NielsenIQ in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Department of Informatics at Lund University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Department of Informatics at Lund University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NielsenIQ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NielsenIQ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Department of Informatics at Lund University

The Department of Informatics at Lund University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NielsenIQ

NielsenIQ

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and NielsenIQ company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and NielsenIQ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and NielsenIQ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and NielsenIQ company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and NielsenIQ company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and NielsenIQ company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and NielsenIQ company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and NielsenIQ company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and NielsenIQ company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and NielsenIQ company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and NielsenIQ company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University and NielsenIQ, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University and NielsenIQ, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Department of Informatics at Lund University or NielsenIQ ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Department of Informatics at Lund University or NielsenIQ ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University and NielsenIQ, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University and NielsenIQ, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3