Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Department of Informatics at Lund UniversityThe Department of Informatics at Lund University
VS
GLGGLG
The Department of Informatics at Lund University

The Department of Informatics at Lund University

Ole Römers väg 6, Lund, undefined, 223 63, SE

Last Update: 14/03/2026

View Profile

The Department of Informatics coordinates the Bachelor's and Master's programs in Information Systems at the School of Economics and Management in Lund. Our research has a broad focus on digital transformation, encompassing both the transformation process and its impact...

NAICS:519
NAICS Definition:Other Information Services
Employees:8
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GLG

GLG

60 East 42nd Street, 3rd Floor, New York, NY, US, 10165

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://glginsights.com
733/1000Moderate

GLG is the world’s largest insight network. We connect decision makers to the right experts so they can act with the confidence that comes from true clarity and have what it takes to get ahead. Our network of experts is the world’s largest source of first-hand expertise...

NAICS:519
NAICS Definition:Other Information Services
Employees:12,148
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Department of Informatics at Lund University

The Department of Informatics at Lund University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GLG

GLG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Department of Informatics at Lund University in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GLG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Department of Informatics at Lund University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Department of Informatics at Lund University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GLG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GLG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Department of Informatics at Lund University

The Department of Informatics at Lund University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GLG

GLG

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
GLG128072625

FAQ

Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and GLG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and GLG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and GLG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and GLG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and GLG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and GLG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and GLG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and GLG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and GLG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and GLG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University company and GLG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University and GLG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University and GLG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Department of Informatics at Lund University or GLG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Department of Informatics at Lund University or GLG ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University and GLG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Department of Informatics at Lund University and GLG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3