Comparison Overview
Institution of Fire Engineers Australia

Institution of Fire Engineers Australia
180 George St, Sydney, 2000, AU
Last Update: 09/06/2026
The Institution of Fire Engineers is an international not for profit organisation formed to promote, encourage, and improve the science and practice of Fire Extinction, Fire Prevention, Fire Engineering and all operations and expedients connected with Community Fire Saf...

DNV
Veritasveien 1, Høvik, Oslo, NO, 1322
Last Update: 02/04/2026
DNV is the independent expert in risk management and assurance, operating in more than 100 countries. Through its broad experience and deep expertise DNV advances safety and sustainable performance, sets industry benchmarks, and inspires and invents solutions. Whether...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Institution of Fire Engineers Australia







DNV






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Institution of Fire Engineers Australia in 2026.
Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DNV in 2026.
Incident History - Institution of Fire Engineers Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Institution of Fire Engineers Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - DNV (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DNV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Institution of Fire Engineers Australia

DNV
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.