Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan companyInstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company
VS
ThoughtworksThoughtworks
InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company

InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company

Philadelphia, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

J.P. Morgan Healthcare Payments has integrated InstaMed solutions to deliver an end-to-end suite of payments, treasury, and banking solutions to healthcare organizations of all sizes. For more information, visit: https://www.jpmorgan.com/industries-we-serve/healthcare

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:142
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Thoughtworks

Thoughtworks

200 E Randolph St, 25th Floor, Chicago, IL, US, 60601-6501

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thoughtworks.com
792/1000Fair

We are a global technology consultancy that delivers extraordinary impact by blending design, engineering and AI expertise. For 30 years, our commitment to design-led thinking, engineering excellence and innovation means we prioritize people, build teams with strong te...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:12,302
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company

InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Thoughtworks

Thoughtworks

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thoughtworks in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Thoughtworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thoughtworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company

InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Thoughtworks

Thoughtworks

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company company and Thoughtworks company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company company and Thoughtworks company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company company and Thoughtworks company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company company and Thoughtworks company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company company and Thoughtworks company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company and Thoughtworks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company and Thoughtworks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company or Thoughtworks ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company or Thoughtworks ?
Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company and Thoughtworks, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between InstaMed, a J.P. Morgan company and Thoughtworks, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96284
SUMMARY

A malicious user can get read-access to files in the flatpak-system-helper context if a system OCI repository is configured, because the OCI code paths in the system helper follow symlinks when importing OCI images that are under the user's control.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-27
UPDATED
Date2026-09-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-100886
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in Seetong T8108, T8108P, T8116 and T8232 4.6.1.4-build202604241011. The affected element is an unknown function of the component Debug Service. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-27
UPDATED
Date2026-09-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-100885
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Krayin laravel-crm up to 2.2.4. This affects an unknown function of the file packages/Webkul/Installer/src/Http/Middleware/CanInstall.php of the component admin-config-setup API Endpoint. The manipulation results in authorization bypass. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. Upgrading to version 2.2.5 mitigates this issue. The patch is identified as 89f2916b6a46ff91bd1999ce38158fa0de8b9490. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-27
UPDATED
Date2026-09-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-100884
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in Krayin laravel-crm up to 2.2.5. The impacted element is the function Storage::download of the file packages/Webkul/Admin/src/Config/acl.php of the component attachment-download Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to improper control of resource identifiers. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 2.2.6 is sufficient to resolve this issue. The identifier of the patch is 13d6988cda8d69ece45ee1890effc90a7f21cdc1. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-27
UPDATED
Date2026-09-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-100883
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in Krayin laravel-crm up to 2.2.5. The affected element is an unknown function of the file packages/Webkul/Admin/src/Config/acl.php. Executing a manipulation can lead to improper access controls. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. Upgrading to version 2.2.6 is sufficient to fix this issue. This patch is called a399404a388d8ad2700a01349d0d98069c8e85a4. The affected component should be upgraded.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-27
UPDATED
Date2026-09-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8