Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Inside the SuiteInside the Suite
VS
SAPSAP
Inside the Suite

Inside the Suite

2300 Oracle Way, Austin, 78741, US

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.netsuite.com/portal/products/erp/financial-management.shtml
755/1000Fair

We provide everything businesses need to grow, all in one place. With a full suite, businesses rely on NetSuite to support financials, CRM, inventory, ecommerce, HR, and more. Instead of businesses needing to adopt point solutions and creating a hairball of solutions, m...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SAP

SAP

Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16, Walldorf, 69190, DE

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.sap.com
726/1000Moderate

SAP is a global leader in enterprise applications and business AI. We help organizations run mission-critical operations across finance, procurement, supply chain, human resources, and customer experience -and move from systems that record work to systems that can help ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:148,412
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Inside the Suite

Inside the Suite

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SAP

SAP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inside the Suite in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

SAP has 494.06% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Inside the Suite (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inside the Suite cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SAP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Inside the Suite

Inside the Suite

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SAP

SAP

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FLOREL1788971139
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SAP1786948236
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MICSAP1786497581

FAQ

Between Inside the Suite company and SAP company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Inside the Suite company and SAP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Inside the Suite company and SAP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Inside the Suite company and SAP company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Inside the Suite company and SAP company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Inside the Suite company and SAP company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Inside the Suite company and SAP company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Inside the Suite company and SAP company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Inside the Suite company and SAP company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Inside the Suite company and SAP company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Inside the Suite company and SAP company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Inside the Suite and SAP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Inside the Suite and SAP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Inside the Suite or SAP ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Inside the Suite or SAP ?
Between Inside the Suite and SAP, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Inside the Suite and SAP, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103342
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103065
SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105122
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105121
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES