Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

inq. Nigeriainq. Nigeria
VS
PT. Indosat TbkPT. Indosat Tbk
inq. Nigeria

inq. Nigeria

3A Aja Nwachukwu Close, Ikoyi, Lagos, Ikoyi, Lagos, NG

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://ng.inq.inc/
753/1000Fair

inq. is a leading Edge solutions provider with a presence in 7 African countries (Nigeria, Botswana, Zambia, Cameron, Cote d'Ivoire, Malawi and South Africa). inq. Digital delivers cutting-edge solutions across five major service categories: Edge AI Solutions, SDN/NFV S...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:168
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PT. Indosat Tbk

PT. Indosat Tbk

Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 21 Jakarta 10110, Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, 10110, ID

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ioh.co.id
768/1000Fair

Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison (IDX: ISAT) ("IOH"), are here with our vision to become the most preferred digital telecommunications company of Indonesia. The IOH merger combines two highly complementary businesses between PT Indosat Tbk (“Indosat Ooredoo”) and PT Hutchison ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:12,844
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
inq. Nigeria

inq. Nigeria

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PT. Indosat Tbk

PT. Indosat Tbk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for inq. Nigeria in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT. Indosat Tbk in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - inq. Nigeria (X = Date, Y = Severity)

inq. Nigeria cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PT. Indosat Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT. Indosat Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
inq. Nigeria

inq. Nigeria

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PT. Indosat Tbk

PT. Indosat Tbk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between inq. Nigeria company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between inq. Nigeria company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between inq. Nigeria company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between inq. Nigeria company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between inq. Nigeria company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between inq. Nigeria company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between inq. Nigeria company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between inq. Nigeria company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between inq. Nigeria company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between inq. Nigeria company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between inq. Nigeria company and PT. Indosat Tbk company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between inq. Nigeria and PT. Indosat Tbk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between inq. Nigeria and PT. Indosat Tbk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - inq. Nigeria or PT. Indosat Tbk ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - inq. Nigeria or PT. Indosat Tbk ?
Between inq. Nigeria and PT. Indosat Tbk, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between inq. Nigeria and PT. Indosat Tbk, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA