Comparison Overview
InPost España

InPost España
Camí de les Oliveres, 1, Vilanova i la Geltrú, Barcelona, ES, 08800
Last Update: 12/11/2025
En InPost somos la mayor red de envío de Europa. Contamos con más 82.000 Punto Pack y Lockers en 9 países y damos servicio a más de 100.000 e-comerciantes y clientes privados. ¿Nuestra misión? Ofrecer a nuestros clientes una experiencia sostenible, cómoda y útil. InP...

DHL Supply Chain
Charles-de-Gaulle-Str. 20, Bonn, 53113, DE
Last Update: 14/09/2026
As the world’s largest contract logistics specialist, we create competitive advantage for customers through customized logistics solutions based on globally standardized warehousing, transportation and integrated services components. We bring sector expertise, global sc...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

InPost España







DHL Supply Chain






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for InPost España in 2026.
Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DHL Supply Chain in 2026.
Incident History - InPost España (X = Date, Y = Severity)
InPost España cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - DHL Supply Chain (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DHL Supply Chain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

InPost España

DHL Supply Chain
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.