Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

inovabrainovabra
VS
YouTubeYouTube
inovabra

inovabra

Cidade de Deus, Osasco, São Paulo, 06028-190, BR

Last Update: 09/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://inovabra.com.br/
753/1000Fair

Bem-vindo à página oficial do inovabra, o ecossistema de inovação do Bradesco! Temos a missão de criar soluções disruptivas para melhorar a vida das pessoas e fazemos isso de forma colaborativa, reunindo funcionários, startups, empresas e investidores em um mesmo ambie...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:33
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
YouTube

YouTube

901 Cherry Ave., San Bruno, 94066, US

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.youtube.com/jobs
753/1000Fair

YouTube is a team-oriented, creative workplace where every single employee has a voice in the choices we make and the features we implement. We work together in small teams to design, develop, and roll out key features and products in very short time frames. Which means...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:144,383
Subsidiaries:51
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
inovabra

inovabra

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
YouTube

YouTube

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for inovabra in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

YouTube has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - inovabra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

inovabra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - YouTube (X = Date, Y = Severity)

YouTube cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
inovabra

inovabra

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
YouTube

YouTube

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MEDZYPTELMETTIKGOOYOU1770029110
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
YOUGOO1782210666
🔒 Incident : Breach
GOOYOU1766548552

FAQ

Between inovabra company and YouTube company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between inovabra company and YouTube company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between inovabra company and YouTube company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between inovabra company and YouTube company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between inovabra company and YouTube company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between inovabra company and YouTube company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between inovabra company and YouTube company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between inovabra company and YouTube company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between inovabra company and YouTube company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between inovabra company and YouTube company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between inovabra company and YouTube company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between inovabra and YouTube, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between inovabra and YouTube, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - inovabra or YouTube ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - inovabra or YouTube ?
Between inovabra and YouTube, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between inovabra and YouTube, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2