Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

InotivInotiv
VS
Technical University of MunichTechnical University of Munich
Inotiv

Inotiv

2701 Kent Ave., West Lafayette, IN, US, 47906

Last Update: 10/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.inotiv.com/
100/1000Critical

WHERE INSIGHTS LEAD TO ANSWERS Expect More In choosing a partner for discovery, development and research models, expect more: more attention, more insight, and a superlative experience. You’ve worked hard to get this far, and you deserve a provider seamlessly aligned ...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:1,845
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Technical University of Munich

Technical University of Munich

Arcisstraße 21, München, Munich, Bavaria, DE, 80333

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tum.de/
781/1000Fair

Our university combines top-class facilities for cutting-edge research with unique learning opportunities for 52,000 students. Whether our researchers are investigating the origins of life, matter and the universe or looking for solutions to the major challenges for our...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:11,505
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Inotiv

Inotiv

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Technical University of Munich

Technical University of Munich

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inotiv in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technical University of Munich in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Inotiv (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inotiv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Technical University of Munich (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technical University of Munich cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Inotiv

Inotiv

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
INO1765266961
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
INO5553055100225
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ENVINO1770890587
Technical University of Munich

Technical University of Munich

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Inotiv company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Inotiv company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Inotiv company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Inotiv company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Inotiv company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Inotiv company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Inotiv company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Inotiv company and Technical University of Munich company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Inotiv company and Technical University of Munich company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Inotiv company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Inotiv company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Inotiv and Technical University of Munich, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Inotiv and Technical University of Munich, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Inotiv or Technical University of Munich ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Inotiv or Technical University of Munich ?
Between Inotiv and Technical University of Munich, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Inotiv and Technical University of Munich, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA