Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Innovative Scientific Solutions, IncInnovative Scientific Solutions, Inc
VS
Lockheed MartinLockheed Martin
Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc

Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc

7610 McEwen Road, Dayton, 45459, US

Last Update: 23/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://innssi.com/
621/1000Poor

Innovative Scientific Solutions Incorporated is an engineering research and development company providing innovative measurement and instrumentation solutions in the areas of Fluid Dynamics, Aerodynamics, Combustion Analysis, and Pressure/Force quantification. ISSI sup...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:72
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Lockheed Martin

Lockheed Martin

6801 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 20817, US

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

The world relies on what we do. Headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, with offices across the U.S. and around the globe, our team delivers solutions that strengthen national security, shape industries and push engineering and technology to new levels. We collaborate t...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:113,476
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc

Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lockheed Martin

Lockheed Martin

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc has 54.95% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Lockheed Martin has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lockheed Martin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lockheed Martin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc

Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
INN1776983225
🔒 Incident : Breach
INN1776803329
Lockheed Martin

Lockheed Martin

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LOC1774283448
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOCULANOR1777876145
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LOC621092125

FAQ

Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc company and Lockheed Martin company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc company and Lockheed Martin company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc company and Lockheed Martin company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc and Lockheed Martin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc and Lockheed Martin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc or Lockheed Martin ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc or Lockheed Martin ?
Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc and Lockheed Martin, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc and Lockheed Martin, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9