Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司
VS
ASUSASUS
Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司

Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司

桃園市蘆竹區南青路1188號, 桃園市, 33066, TW

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

鴻佰科技股份有限公司(Ingrasys Inc.)是富士康科技集團(Foxconn Technology Group)的子公司,是世界級智慧型雲網服務產品之技術領導者,提供廣泛的產品和服務,包括伺服器、儲存裝置、高性能計算加速器和創新的環境友善解決方案,協助全球客戶滿足使用需求。公司已獲得AS9100認證,確保提供高品質的航太產品和服務。更多資訊,請參考鴻佰科技相關網站: -> Ingrasys Inc.:https://www.ingrasys.com/ -> LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/c...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:689
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ASUS

ASUS

No.15, Lide Road, Taipei City, 112, TW

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.asus.com
578/1000Very Poor

ASUS is a global technology leader delivering incredible experiences that enhance the lives of people everywhere. World renowned for continuously reimagining today’s technologies for tomorrow, ASUS puts users first In Search of Incredible to provide the world’s most inn...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:17,685
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司

Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ASUS

ASUS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

ASUS has 390.2% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ASUS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASUS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司

Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ASUS

ASUS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ASU1784744702
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ASU1779539103
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DIETOYFILASUCITBENMAGLINYAMFIATHEBAN1774023969

FAQ

Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 company and ASUS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 company and ASUS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 company and ASUS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 company and ASUS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 company and ASUS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 company and ASUS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 company and ASUS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 company and ASUS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 company and ASUS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 company and ASUS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 company and ASUS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 and ASUS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 and ASUS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 or ASUS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 or ASUS ?
Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 and ASUS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ingrasys 鴻佰科技股份有限公司 and ASUS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94426
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /jobgroup/insert. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94425
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Moore Threads MTT S80 Driver Package 340.150. The affected element is the function sub_140006F0C in the library mtdispkm64.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. Attacking locally is a requirement. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2
CVE-2026-94627
SUMMARY

vLLM Mooncake connector through 0.29.0 fails to properly manage GPU KV cache block ownership when concurrent child requests share a single transfer ID in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Attackers can trigger GPU memory exhaustion by submitting completion requests with multiple prompts, causing orphaned KV cache blocks to accumulate until process restart and eventually preventing legitimate requests from executing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94626
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to validate the tp_size parameter in kv_transfer_params on OpenAI-compatible completion endpoints, allowing attackers to allocate unbounded memory. Attackers can supply arbitrary tp_size values in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments to exhaust memory and trigger kernel OOM-kill of the decode worker process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94625
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in MooncakeConnector where rejected prefill requests create ownerless transfer placeholders that are never reclaimed. Attackers can send rejected requests to exhaust sender task pools, causing valid requests to be delayed by up to 480 seconds while health checks continue returning success.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9