Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ingram Micro UCC GulfIngram Micro UCC Gulf
VS
General Dynamics Information TechnologyGeneral Dynamics Information Technology
Ingram Micro UCC Gulf

Ingram Micro UCC Gulf

Al Falak Street, Dubai, AE

Last Update: 12/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://ae.ingrammicro.com/
751/1000Fair

Communicating is at the very heart of business success. Give your customers the gift of simplified communication wherever they are, with leading end-to-end UCC solutions carefully selected by Ingram Micro.

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
General Dynamics Information Technology

General Dynamics Information Technology

Falls Church, Virginia, US, 22042

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gdit.com
786/1000Fair

GDIT is a global technology and professional services company that delivers solutions, technology and mission services to every major agency across the U.S. government, defense and intelligence community. Our 30,000 experts extract the power of technology to create imm...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:26,279
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ingram Micro UCC Gulf

Ingram Micro UCC Gulf

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
General Dynamics Information Technology

General Dynamics Information Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ingram Micro UCC Gulf in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Dynamics Information Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ingram Micro UCC Gulf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ingram Micro UCC Gulf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - General Dynamics Information Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Dynamics Information Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ingram Micro UCC Gulf

Ingram Micro UCC Gulf

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
General Dynamics Information Technology

General Dynamics Information Technology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GDI1765641604

FAQ

Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and General Dynamics Information Technology company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf and General Dynamics Information Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf and General Dynamics Information Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ingram Micro UCC Gulf or General Dynamics Information Technology ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ingram Micro UCC Gulf or General Dynamics Information Technology ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf and General Dynamics Information Technology, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf and General Dynamics Information Technology, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA