Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ingram Micro UCC GulfIngram Micro UCC Gulf
VS
CACI International IncCACI International Inc
Ingram Micro UCC Gulf

Ingram Micro UCC Gulf

Al Falak Street, Dubai, AE

Last Update: 12/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://ae.ingrammicro.com/
751/1000Fair

Communicating is at the very heart of business success. Give your customers the gift of simplified communication wherever they are, with leading end-to-end UCC solutions carefully selected by Ingram Micro.

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CACI International Inc

CACI International Inc

12021 Sunset Hills Rd, Reston, 20190, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.caci.com
783/1000Fair

At CACI International Inc (NYSE: CACI), our 25,000 talented and dynamic employees are ever vigilant in delivering distinctive expertise and technology to meet our customers’ greatest challenges in national security. We are a company of good character, relentless innovat...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:21,564
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ingram Micro UCC Gulf

Ingram Micro UCC Gulf

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CACI International Inc

CACI International Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ingram Micro UCC Gulf in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CACI International Inc in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ingram Micro UCC Gulf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ingram Micro UCC Gulf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CACI International Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CACI International Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ingram Micro UCC Gulf

Ingram Micro UCC Gulf

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CACI International Inc

CACI International Inc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and CACI International Inc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and CACI International Inc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and CACI International Inc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and CACI International Inc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and CACI International Inc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and CACI International Inc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and CACI International Inc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and CACI International Inc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and CACI International Inc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and CACI International Inc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf company and CACI International Inc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf and CACI International Inc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf and CACI International Inc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ingram Micro UCC Gulf or CACI International Inc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ingram Micro UCC Gulf or CACI International Inc ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf and CACI International Inc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ingram Micro UCC Gulf and CACI International Inc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2