Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ING Česká republikaING Česká republika
VS
Aditya Birla CapitalAditya Birla Capital
ING Česká republika

ING Česká republika

Českomoravská 2420/15, Praha 9, undefined, 190 00, CZ

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ing.cz
753/1000Fair

Historie ING Bank v České republice sahá až do roku 1992, kdy jako jedna z prvních předních světových bank vstoupila na český trh a vybudovala si silnou pozici v oblasti korporátního bankovnictví. ING Bank poskytuje celou škálu bankovních produktů a služeb řadě významný...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:76
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aditya Birla Capital

Aditya Birla Capital

One World Center, Tower 1, 18th Floor, Jupiter Mills Compound, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road, Mumbai, IN, 400013

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
779/1000Fair

Aditya Birla Capital Ltd is a financial services company based out of One World Center, Tower 1, 18th Floor, Jupiter Mills Compound, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road, MUMBAI, India. - Aditya Birla Capital is committed to provide equal opportunity to all in em...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:29,937
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ING Česká republika

ING Česká republika

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aditya Birla Capital

Aditya Birla Capital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ING Česká republika in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aditya Birla Capital in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ING Česká republika (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ING Česká republika cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aditya Birla Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aditya Birla Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ING Česká republika

ING Česká republika

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aditya Birla Capital

Aditya Birla Capital

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ING Česká republika company and Aditya Birla Capital company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ING Česká republika company and Aditya Birla Capital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ING Česká republika company and Aditya Birla Capital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ING Česká republika company and Aditya Birla Capital company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ING Česká republika company and Aditya Birla Capital company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ING Česká republika company and Aditya Birla Capital company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ING Česká republika company and Aditya Birla Capital company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ING Česká republika company and Aditya Birla Capital company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ING Česká republika company and Aditya Birla Capital company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ING Česká republika company and Aditya Birla Capital company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ING Česká republika company and Aditya Birla Capital company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ING Česká republika and Aditya Birla Capital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ING Česká republika and Aditya Birla Capital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ING Česká republika or Aditya Birla Capital ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ING Česká republika or Aditya Birla Capital ?
Between ING Česká republika and Aditya Birla Capital, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ING Česká republika and Aditya Birla Capital, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8