Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ING AustraliaING Australia
VS
VakıfBankVakıfBank
ING Australia

ING Australia

60 Margaret St, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU

Last Update: 21/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ing.com.au
762/1000Fair

We exist to empower people to stay ahead, in business and in life. We’re proud to be part of ING Group, the world’s leading direct savings bank – and even prouder to be Australia’s most recommended bank. That’s because, for us, nothing matters more than being loved by o...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:1,774
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
VakıfBank

VakıfBank

İstanbul, 34415, TR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vakifbank.com.tr
770/1000Fair

1954 yılında, vakıf kaynaklarını ekonomik kalkınmanın gereksinimleri doğrultusunda en iyi biçimde değerlendirmek amacıyla kurulan VakıfBank, o günden bu yana çağdaş bankacılık yöntemleri ve uygulamalarıyla Türkiye’nin tasarruf düzeyinin gelişim sürecine katkıda bulunmak...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:11,668
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ING Australia

ING Australia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
VakıfBank

VakıfBank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ING Australia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VakıfBank in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ING Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ING Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - VakıfBank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VakıfBank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ING Australia

ING Australia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
VakıfBank

VakıfBank

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ING Australia company and VakıfBank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ING Australia company and VakıfBank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ING Australia company and VakıfBank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ING Australia company and VakıfBank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ING Australia company and VakıfBank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ING Australia company and VakıfBank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ING Australia company and VakıfBank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ING Australia company and VakıfBank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ING Australia company and VakıfBank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ING Australia company and VakıfBank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ING Australia company and VakıfBank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ING Australia and VakıfBank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ING Australia and VakıfBank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ING Australia or VakıfBank ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ING Australia or VakıfBank ?
Between ING Australia and VakıfBank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ING Australia and VakıfBank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2