Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Infosys Engineering ServicesInfosys Engineering Services
VS
Quest GlobalQuest Global
Infosys Engineering Services

Infosys Engineering Services

N/A

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Infosys Engineering Services is strategically positioned to respond to real-time customer needs and proactively propose disruptive solutions to help enterprises stay ahead. We enable enterprises to deliver better products and greater experiences while ensuring lower cos...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Quest Global

Quest Global

7, Temasek Boulevard,, #09-04 Suntec Tower One,, Singapore, SG, 038987

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.questglobal.com/
791/1000Fair

We are Quest Global. We’re in the business of engineering, but what we’re really building is a brighter future. It’s not just what we do, but why we do it that makes us different. We believe engineering has the unique opportunity to solve the problems of today that stan...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:20,185
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Infosys Engineering Services

Infosys Engineering Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Quest Global

Quest Global

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Infosys Engineering Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Quest Global has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Infosys Engineering Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infosys Engineering Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Quest Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quest Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Infosys Engineering Services

Infosys Engineering Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Quest Global

Quest Global

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
QUE1774275950

FAQ

Between Infosys Engineering Services company and Quest Global company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Infosys Engineering Services company and Quest Global company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Infosys Engineering Services company and Quest Global company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Infosys Engineering Services company and Quest Global company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Infosys Engineering Services company and Quest Global company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Infosys Engineering Services company and Quest Global company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Infosys Engineering Services company and Quest Global company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Infosys Engineering Services company and Quest Global company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Infosys Engineering Services company and Quest Global company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Infosys Engineering Services company and Quest Global company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Infosys Engineering Services company and Quest Global company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Infosys Engineering Services and Quest Global, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Infosys Engineering Services and Quest Global, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Infosys Engineering Services or Quest Global ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Infosys Engineering Services or Quest Global ?
Between Infosys Engineering Services and Quest Global, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Infosys Engineering Services and Quest Global, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA