Comparison Overview
Infosys Engineering Services

Infosys Engineering Services
N/A
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Infosys Engineering Services is strategically positioned to respond to real-time customer needs and proactively propose disruptive solutions to help enterprises stay ahead. We enable enterprises to deliver better products and greater experiences while ensuring lower cos...

Quest Global
7, Temasek Boulevard,, #09-04 Suntec Tower One,, Singapore, SG, 038987
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We are Quest Global. We’re in the business of engineering, but what we’re really building is a brighter future. It’s not just what we do, but why we do it that makes us different. We believe engineering has the unique opportunity to solve the problems of today that stan...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Infosys Engineering Services







Quest Global






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Infosys Engineering Services in 2026.
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Quest Global has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Infosys Engineering Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Infosys Engineering Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Quest Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Quest Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Infosys Engineering Services

Quest Global
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.
The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.
Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.
The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.