Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Infoblox

Infoblox Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

infoblox.com

Infoblox unites networking and security to deliver unmatched performance and protection. Trusted by Fortune 100 companies and emerging innovators, we provide real-time visibility and control over who and what connects to your network, so your organization runs faster and stops threats earlier.


Infoblox A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Infoblox
Company Information
Website:http://www.infoblox.com
Employees number:3,366
Number of followers:222,669
NAICS:541514
Industry Type:Computer and Network Security
Homepage:infoblox.com
Infoblox Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
InfobloxComputer and Network Security
Updated:
22/07/2026
738/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Infoblox Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
InfobloxComputer and Network Security
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Infoblox
InfobloxModerate
Current Score
738Ba (MODERATE)
01000
2 incidents
-17 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
SEPTEMBER 2026
740Before Incident
AUGUST 2026
739Before Incident
JULY 2026
738Before Incident
JUNE 2026
737Before Incident
MAY 2026
753Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 May 2026Infoblox
Infoblox: Hackers Abuse Compromised Outlook Accounts to Steal MFA-Protected Microsoft 365 Sessions

Sophisticated AiTM Phishing Campaign Hijacks Microsoft 365 Sessions via Compromised Outlook Accounts

735After Incident
CRITICAL-18
INF1784716085
Sophisticated AiTM Phishing Campaign Hijacks Microsoft 365 Sessions via Compromised Outlook Accounts In May 2026, security researchers at Infoblox uncovered a highly targeted adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing campaign abusing Microsoft Outlook mailboxes to steal multi-factor authenticated (MFA) Microsoft 365 sessions. The attack, which began with a single phishing email sent to a small group of employees, rapidly escalated into a cross-organizational compromise, leveraging trusted internal communication channels to spread. ### How the Attack Works 1. Initial Compromise – Attackers send procurement-themed phishing emails (e.g., RFIs, bid invitations, or shared documents) from compromised Outlook accounts, making them appear legitimate to recipients. 2. Fake Portals & Cloned Logins – Victims who click embedded links are redirected through compromised domains (e.g., testserveren[.]com, barifurniture[.]net) to fake document portals and spoofed Microsoft 365 login pages. 3. Session Hijacking – Using reverse proxy kits like EvilProxy, FlowerStorm, and Kali365, attackers intercept credentials and live session cookies, bypassing MFA and gaining full access to Outlook, SharePoint, and Microsoft 365 resources. 4. Lateral Movement – Once inside, attackers reuse compromised mailboxes to send new phishing emails, extending the attack chain to internal teams and external partners. ### Targets & Tactics The campaign focuses on high-value organizations, including: - Universities - Enterprises - Multinational institutions (e.g., EU and UN-linked bodies) Phishing emails mimic routine business workflows, using urgent deadlines and familiar sender addresses to evade suspicion. Attackers exploit aged, legitimate-looking domains (e.g., testserveren[.]com) to bypass domain reputation checks, while RDGA-generated domains (e.g., consistenthostinghub[.]de) further obscure detection. ### Impact & Broader Threat Landscape - Full Identity Inheritance – Stolen session cookies grant attackers authenticated access to email, files, and SaaS applications, enabling payroll fraud, data exfiltration, and further account takeovers. - MFA Bypass – Since attackers proxy authentication flows in real time, MFA protections are rendered ineffective. - Industry-Wide Trend – This campaign aligns with Storm-2755 and other AiTM attacks, where threat actors prioritize session hijacking over credential theft for deeper, persistent access. ### Detection Challenges & Defensive Insights Traditional defenses MFA, URL filtering, and domain reputation checks struggle against these attacks. Infoblox recommends: - DNS-based threat intelligence to detect infrastructure reuse and subdomain patterns. - Continuous monitoring of Microsoft 365 sign-in behaviors to identify anomalous session activity. - Conditional access policies to limit the lifespan of stolen sessions. ### Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) Key domains linked to the campaign include: - Compromised hosting domains: barifurniture[.]net, testserveren[.]com, satoriestate[.]com - Phishing infrastructure: consistenthostinghub[.]de (FlowerStorm), assessmentevaluationreport[.]com (EvilProxy), duemineral[.]uk (Kali365) The attack underscores the evolving sophistication of AiTM phishing, where trusted communication channels become attack vectors, and session-based compromises outpace traditional credential theft.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Phishing (AiTM)
MOTIVATION
Data exfiltration, payroll fraud, account takeover, lateral movement
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Microsoft 365 session cookies, credentials, Outlook emails, SharePoint files, SaaS application accessSystems Affected: Microsoft 365 (Outlook, SharePoint), internal communication channelsOperational Impact: Lateral movement within organizations, cross-organizational compromise, trusted communication abuseBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to trusted channel abuseIdentity Theft Risk: High (full identity inheritance via session cookies)Payment Information Risk: Potential (payroll fraud)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Session cookies, credentials, emails, files, SaaS application accessSensitivity Of Data: High (PII, corporate communications, sensitive documents)Data Exfiltration: Possible (not explicitly confirmed)Personally Identifiable Information: Likely (emails, corporate data)
APRIL 2026
753Before Incident
MARCH 2026
752Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
752Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
767Before Incident
Cyber Attack
19 Jan 2026Infoblox
Infoblox: Researchers Gained Access to Hacker Domain Server Using Name Server Delegation

Cybercriminals’ Push-Notification Scam Exposed by DNS Misconfiguration

751After Incident
LOW-16
INF1768815998
Cybercriminals’ Push-Notification Scam Exposed by DNS Misconfiguration A recent investigation by Infoblox uncovered a large-scale push-notification scam targeting Android users, revealing how a simple DNS error exposed the criminal infrastructure behind it. The campaign bombarded victims with fake security alerts, gambling ads, and adult-content lures, generating revenue through clicks while evading detection behind random domains and hidden hosting. The operation unraveled when a misconfigured name server left one of the attacker’s domains in a "lame delegation" state no longer resolving to a valid backend, yet still receiving traffic from infected devices. Infoblox researchers exploited this oversight by legitimately registering the abandoned domain, redirecting traffic to their own servers without altering victim devices or the attacker’s infrastructure. Over several days, the team intercepted tens of millions of records from thousands of infected browsers worldwide. The data revealed aggressive tactics, including brand impersonation and scare-based messaging, with some users receiving over 100 notifications daily for months. The infection process began when users visited compromised or malicious sites, tricked into enabling browser notifications amid deceptive pop-ups, cookie banners, and CAPTCHAs. Once granted, a hidden service worker embedded in the browser maintained persistent access, fetching updated scripts and ad templates from the attacker’s servers even after the original tab was closed. The incident highlights how cybercriminals exploit web standards and poor DNS hygiene to sustain long-term access, while defenders can leverage misconfigurations to monitor and disrupt such operations.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Push-Notification Scam
MOTIVATION
Financial gain through ad clicks
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Browser notification data, user interaction recordsSystems Affected: Infected Android browsers (via service workers)Operational Impact: Persistent unauthorized access to user browsers
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Browser notification data, user interaction recordsNumber Of Records Exposed: Tens of millionsSensitivity Of Data: Low to medium (no PII or payment data explicitly mentioned)
DECEMBER 2025
767Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
767Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
767Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Infoblox ?
?
What was Infoblox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2026 ?
?
What was Infoblox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was Infoblox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Infoblox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Infoblox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Infoblox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Infoblox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Infoblox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Infoblox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Infoblox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Infoblox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Infoblox's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Infoblox ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Infoblox's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?