Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

InfoArmorInfoArmor
VS
GFT TechnologiesGFT Technologies
InfoArmor

InfoArmor

7350 N Dobson Rd, Scottsdale, 85256, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.linkedin.com/company/allstate-identity-protection/
749/1000Moderate

InfoArmor is now Allstate Identity Protection. Please visit and follow our new page at https://www.linkedin.com/company/allstate-identity-protection/.

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:37
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

Schelmenwasenstr. 34, Stuttgart, 70567, DE

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gft.com
752/1000Fair

GFT Technologies is an AI-centric global digital transformation company. We design advanced data and AI transformation solutions, modernize technology architectures and develop next-generation core systems for industry leaders in Banking, Insurance, Manufacturing and Ro...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:13,147
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
InfoArmor

InfoArmor

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InfoArmor in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GFT Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - InfoArmor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InfoArmor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GFT Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GFT Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
InfoArmor

InfoArmor

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between InfoArmor company and GFT Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between InfoArmor company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between InfoArmor company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between InfoArmor company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between InfoArmor company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between InfoArmor company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between InfoArmor company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between InfoArmor company and GFT Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between InfoArmor company and GFT Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between InfoArmor company and GFT Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between InfoArmor company and GFT Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between InfoArmor and GFT Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between InfoArmor and GFT Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - InfoArmor or GFT Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - InfoArmor or GFT Technologies ?
Between InfoArmor and GFT Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between InfoArmor and GFT Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-103047
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - CentralAuth extension allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Mediawiki - CentralAuth extension: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103046
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki - WikiLambda extension allows Stored XSS. This issue affects MediaWiki - WikiLambda extension: before 1.46.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103045
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - Refreshed skin allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Mediawiki - Refreshed skin: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103044
SUMMARY

XML injection (aka blind XPath injection) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - EasyTimeline extension allows XML Injection. This issue affects Mediawiki - EasyTimeline extension: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103043
SUMMARY

anchorme through 3.0.8 contains a regular expression denial of service vulnerability in the IPv6 host extraction regex due to catastrophic backtracking. Attackers can supply specially crafted input strings with repeated patterns to cause exponential regex engine backtracking, blocking the Node.js event loop and denying service to other requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES