Comparison Overview
Info Quest Technologies

Info Quest Technologies
2A Argiroupoleos, Athens, Attika, 17671, GR
Last Update: 01/01/2026
A Greek company which successfully incorporates new technological trends, providing the complete spectrum of advanced products, integrated solutions and sophisticated services satisfying the emerging needs in the age of convergence of Information Technology and Telecomm...

SoftwareOne
Riedenmatt 4, Stans, CH, 6370
Last Update: 11/09/2026
SoftwareOne is a global software and cloud solutions provider. With a presence in over 70 countries and a team of around 13,000 professionals, we combine global scale and local expertise to help clients optimize costs, accelerate growth, and navigate complex IT environm...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Info Quest Technologies







SoftwareOne






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Info Quest Technologies in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SoftwareOne in 2026.
Incident History - Info Quest Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Info Quest Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SoftwareOne (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SoftwareOne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Info Quest Technologies

SoftwareOne
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.