Comparison Overview
Infinite Campus

Infinite Campus
4321 109th Ave NE, Blaine, 55449, US
Last Update: 04/05/2026
Since 1993, Infinite Campus has successfully implemented solutions for customers of all sizes. As the #1 trending student information system in the United States, Infinite Campus applications manage 11 million students in 46 different states. Infinite Campus customers r...

Epic
1979 Milky Way, Verona, WI, US, 53593
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Join us in our mission to help the world get well, help the world stay well, and help future generations be healthier. We hire smart and motivated people from all academic majors to code, test, and implement healthcare software that hundreds of millions of patients and...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Infinite Campus







Epic






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Infinite Campus has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Epic in 2026.
Incident History - Infinite Campus (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Infinite Campus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Epic (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Epic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Infinite Campus

Epic
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.