Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Inex Partners OyInex Partners Oy
VS
Transnet SOC LtdTransnet SOC Ltd
Inex Partners Oy

Inex Partners Oy

Keuksuontie 3, Sipoo, 04220, FI

Last Update: 27/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.inex.fi/
753/1000Fair

Inex Partners Oy on SOK:n (Suomen Osuukauppojen Keskuskunta) kokonaan omistama logistiikkayhtiö. Inexin tehtävänä on tuottaa logistiikkapalvelut S-ryhmän päivittäis- ja käyttötavarakaupan ketjuille. Inexillä on Sipoon Bastukärrissä sijaitsevien logistiikkakeskusten lis...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:404
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Transnet SOC Ltd

Transnet SOC Ltd

138 Eloff Street, Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA, 2001

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.transnet.net
776/1000Fair

As the custodian of ports, rail and pipelines, Transnet’s objective is to ensure a globally competitive freight system that enables sustained growth and diversification of the country’s economy. As a state-owned company, Transnet continues to leave an indelible mark ...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:27,301
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Inex Partners Oy

Inex Partners Oy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Transnet SOC Ltd

Transnet SOC Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inex Partners Oy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transnet SOC Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Inex Partners Oy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inex Partners Oy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Transnet SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transnet SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Inex Partners Oy

Inex Partners Oy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Transnet SOC Ltd

Transnet SOC Ltd

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TRA603092125

FAQ

Between Inex Partners Oy company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Inex Partners Oy company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Inex Partners Oy company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Inex Partners Oy company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Inex Partners Oy company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Inex Partners Oy company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Inex Partners Oy company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Inex Partners Oy company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Inex Partners Oy company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Inex Partners Oy company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Inex Partners Oy company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Inex Partners Oy and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Inex Partners Oy and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Inex Partners Oy or Transnet SOC Ltd ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Inex Partners Oy or Transnet SOC Ltd ?
Between Inex Partners Oy and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Inex Partners Oy and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2