Comparison Overview
INEOS Energy

INEOS Energy
London, GB, London, GB
Last Update: 26/10/2025
INEOS is a global chemical, manufacturing and energy company. It comprises of 36 businesses, spanning across 182 sites and 31 countries throughout the world. Our core values include excellence in safety, health and environmental performance; Encouragement of innovation,...

aramco
P.O. Box 5000, Dhahran, SA, 31311
Last Update: 19/07/2026
We’re a leading producer of the energy and chemicals that drive global commerce and enhance the daily lives of people around the globe by continuing delivering an uninterrupted supply of energy to the world. Our resilience and agility has built one of the world’s large...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

INEOS Energy







aramco






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for INEOS Energy in 2026.
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for aramco in 2026.
Incident History - INEOS Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
INEOS Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - aramco (X = Date, Y = Severity)
aramco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

INEOS Energy

aramco
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.