Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

INEOS Polymers SarralbeINEOS Polymers Sarralbe
VS
GivaudanGivaudan
INEOS Polymers Sarralbe

INEOS Polymers Sarralbe

Rue Ernest Solvay, Sarralbe, 57430, FR

Last Update: 25/01/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Située en Moselle, l’usine Ineos de Sarralbe est un site pétrochimique qui produit du polyéthylène haute densité (HD PE), du polypropylène (PP) et des catalyseurs. Nos matériaux sont utilisés comme base d’une large gamme de produits qui améliorent de nombreux aspects d...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:31
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Givaudan

Givaudan

Givaudan International SA, Vernier, 1214, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.givaudan.com
803/1000Good

Givaudan is a global leader in Fragrance & Beauty and Taste & Wellbeing. We celebrate the beauty of human experience by creating for happier, healthier lives with love for nature. Together with our customers we deliver food experiences, craft inspired fragrances, and de...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:14,643
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
INEOS Polymers Sarralbe

INEOS Polymers Sarralbe

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Givaudan

Givaudan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INEOS Polymers Sarralbe in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Givaudan in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - INEOS Polymers Sarralbe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INEOS Polymers Sarralbe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Givaudan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Givaudan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
INEOS Polymers Sarralbe

INEOS Polymers Sarralbe

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Givaudan

Givaudan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe company and Givaudan company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe company and Givaudan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe company and Givaudan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe company and Givaudan company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe company and Givaudan company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe company and Givaudan company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe company and Givaudan company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe company and Givaudan company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe company and Givaudan company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe company and Givaudan company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe company and Givaudan company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe and Givaudan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe and Givaudan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - INEOS Polymers Sarralbe or Givaudan ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - INEOS Polymers Sarralbe or Givaudan ?
Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe and Givaudan, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between INEOS Polymers Sarralbe and Givaudan, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2