Comparison Overview
Industrial Systems, Inc.

Industrial Systems, Inc.
5513 Hwy 348, Delta, 81416, US
Last Update: 13/03/2026
Industrial Systems, Inc. was founded in 1991 in order to fill the industry need for a large contractor service at a small contractor’s price and flexibility. With over 100 million dollars in total sales, an indoor fabrication facility of 38,000 square feet, 12 acres of ...

McDermott International, Ltd
915 N. Eldridge Parkway, Houston, 77079, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
McDermott is a premier provider of engineering and construction solutions to the energy industry. Our customers trust our technology-driven approach—engineered to responsibly harness and transform global energy resources into the products the world needs for now and w...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Industrial Systems, Inc.







McDermott International, Ltd






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
Industrial Systems, Inc. has 58.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for McDermott International, Ltd in 2026.
Incident History - Industrial Systems, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Industrial Systems, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - McDermott International, Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
McDermott International, Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Industrial Systems, Inc.

McDermott International, Ltd
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.