Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

inDrive.TechinDrive.Tech
VS
Akamai TechnologiesAkamai Technologies
inDrive.Tech

inDrive.Tech

Mountain View Ave, Mountain View, 94040, US

Last Update: 20/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://indrive.tech/
768/1000Fair

The official page of the inDrive Tech Community. inDrive.Tech is a team of inDrive developers who know how to experiment and learn from their mistakes for continuous growth. We are 500 engineers working in over 50 cross-functional teams. We have people working for us w...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

8 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, US, 02142

Last Update: 28/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.akamai.com
732/1000Moderate

At Akamai, we make life better for billions of people, billions of times a day. Every day, billions of people around the world connect with their favorite brands to shop online, play the latest video games, log into mobile banking apps, learn remotely, share videos wi...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,327
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
inDrive.Tech

inDrive.Tech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for inDrive.Tech in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Akamai Technologies has 88.68% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - inDrive.Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

inDrive.Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Akamai Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Akamai Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
inDrive.Tech

inDrive.Tech

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TOLTELAKA1777389934
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AKA1776515140
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
UNIAKA1773995078

FAQ

Between inDrive.Tech company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between inDrive.Tech company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between inDrive.Tech company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between inDrive.Tech company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between inDrive.Tech company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between inDrive.Tech company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between inDrive.Tech company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between inDrive.Tech company and Akamai Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between inDrive.Tech company and Akamai Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between inDrive.Tech company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between inDrive.Tech company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between inDrive.Tech and Akamai Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between inDrive.Tech and Akamai Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - inDrive.Tech or Akamai Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - inDrive.Tech or Akamai Technologies ?
Between inDrive.Tech and Akamai Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between inDrive.Tech and Akamai Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-55175
SUMMARY

Spinnaker is an open source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform. Prior to versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4 on their respective release lines, Kustomize bake operations allow unsafe YAML tag processing in rosco manifests. This can lead to remote code execution on rosco pods when performing Kustomize bakes. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-44383
SUMMARY

Multiple connections to the backend using the same charging station ID are allowed, which could allow an attacker to deploy multiple instances of malicious OCPP clients to overwhelm the backend.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42952
SUMMARY

Previously, there was no throttling on repeated authentication attempts to the charging station backend, which could allow an attacker to execute a denial-of-service attack.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-20744
SUMMARY

The charging station websocket endpoint accepts connections without proper authentication, which could lead to privilege escalation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-15089
SUMMARY

vulnerability in Drupal Commerce guest registration allows . This issue affects Commerce guest registration versions: *.*.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA