Comparison Overview

PT. Indosat Tbk

VS

Safaricom PLC

PT. Indosat Tbk

Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 21 Jakarta 10110, Indonesia, None, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, ID, 10110
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison (IDX: ISAT) ("IOH"), are here with our vision to become the most preferred digital telecommunications company of Indonesia. The IOH merger combines two highly complementary businesses between PT Indosat Tbk (“Indosat Ooredoo”) and PT Hutchison 3 Indonesia to create a new world-class digital telecoms and internet company for Indonesia that can better compete and create additional value for all stakeholders, including employees, customers, and shareholders. Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison is now the second-largest mobile telecoms business in Indonesia. Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison will be guided by its corporate vision “To Become the Most Preferred Digital Telco of Indonesia” to capture the tremendous market opportunities presented by Indonesia’s digital and economic growth. The Company’s enhanced scale, financial strength, and expertise, combined with its preeminent networks, talent, and strategic partnerships, will enable Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison to become a key telco player driving Indonesia’s digital transformation agenda. The Company will focus on its core mission of delivering world-class digital experiences while connecting and empowering every Indonesian.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 11,733
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Safaricom PLC

Waiyaki Way, Westlands, Nairobi, Nairobi, KE, P.O. Box 66827, 00800, Nairobi
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Safaricom is the leading provider of converged communication solutions in Kenya. In addition to providing a broad range of first-class products and services for Telephony, Broadband Internet and Financial services, Safaricom seeks to uplift the welfare of Kenyans through value-added services and support for community projects. With over 29 Million subscribers and an estimated market share of 67%, the Company has the widest modern mobile network coverage in Kenya and prides in its experienced shareholders, attractive tariffs, a nationwide network of effective dealers, high caliber staff and management enabling it to maintain its position as the region’s mobile market leader. M-PESA has over 23 million subscribers, supported by a nationwide agent network of over 156,000 outlets. M-PESA is the world's most developed biggest mobile payment system. Facts about Safaricom • Employs over 5,500 staff directly and over 500,000 indirectly • Has approximately 4,945 network sites across the country • 50% of employees and 32% of senior management working at Safaricom are women. • Has the largest call center in Sub-Saharan Africa Our people are our most valuable asset and are key to the achievement of our vision of transforming lives. This is reflected in our commitment to creating a working environment that supports our staff. We offer employees a wellness programme, crèche facilities, access to subsidized gym facilities, leisure amenities, regular social events, competitive salaries and career opportunities. We give back to the society through the Safaricom Foundation. Since inception, the foundation has disbursed 2 billion shillings in different initiatives that provide sustainable community-based solutions, contributing towards Kenya’s development agenda, and the Millennium Development Goals. Safaricom is a key member and supporter of the B Team and the B Team – Africa, alliances of business leaders who are committed to responsible and sustainable business practices.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 16,081
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indosat.jpeg
PT. Indosat Tbk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/safaricom.jpeg
Safaricom PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PT. Indosat Tbk
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Safaricom PLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT. Indosat Tbk in 2026.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Safaricom PLC in 2026.

Incident History — PT. Indosat Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT. Indosat Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Safaricom PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Safaricom PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indosat.jpeg
PT. Indosat Tbk
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/safaricom.jpeg
Safaricom PLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Safaricom PLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PT. Indosat Tbk company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Safaricom PLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PT. Indosat Tbk company.

In the current year, Safaricom PLC company and PT. Indosat Tbk company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Safaricom PLC company nor PT. Indosat Tbk company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Safaricom PLC company nor PT. Indosat Tbk company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Safaricom PLC company nor PT. Indosat Tbk company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PT. Indosat Tbk company nor Safaricom PLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PT. Indosat Tbk nor Safaricom PLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Safaricom PLC company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PT. Indosat Tbk company.

Safaricom PLC company employs more people globally than PT. Indosat Tbk company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither PT. Indosat Tbk nor Safaricom PLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PT. Indosat Tbk nor Safaricom PLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PT. Indosat Tbk nor Safaricom PLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PT. Indosat Tbk nor Safaricom PLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PT. Indosat Tbk nor Safaricom PLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PT. Indosat Tbk nor Safaricom PLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N