Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

INDISOL Bilişim ve TeknolojiINDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji
VS
eBayeBay
INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji

INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji

Maslak Mah. Taşyoncası Sk. YTÜ Maslak 1453 Yerleşkesi No: 1 G İç Kapı No: B1 Kat: 10 , Sarıyer / İSTANBUL, İstanbul, Sarıyer, TR, 34398

Last Update: 01/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.indisol.com.tr/
767/1000Fair

Indisol, teknoloji ve dijital dönüşümü odağına alıp yeni ve daha büyük başarılara imza atmak üzere OYAK bünyesinde öncelikle OYAK Grup Şirketlerine hizmet etmek amacıyla 2023 yılında kuruldu. Indisol, yazılım geliştirme ve yazılım teknoloji dönüşüm hizmeti sunan bir te...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:77
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
eBay

eBay

2025 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, 95125, US

Last Update: 04/08/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.ebayinc.com/
805/1000Good

At eBay, we create pathways to connect millions of sellers and buyers in more than 190 markets around the world. Our technology empowers our customers, providing everyone the opportunity to grow and thrive — no matter who they are or where they are in the world. And the...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:21,881
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji

INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
eBay

eBay

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

eBay has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - eBay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eBay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji

INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
eBay

eBay

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GOOEBA1785781429
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GOOEBA1785824643
🔒 Incident : Breach
EBA1722323

FAQ

Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji company and eBay company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji company and eBay company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji company and eBay company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji company and eBay company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji company and eBay company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji company and eBay company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji company and eBay company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji company and eBay company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji company and eBay company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji company and eBay company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji company and eBay company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji and eBay, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji and eBay, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji or eBay ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji or eBay ?
Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji and eBay, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between INDISOL Bilişim ve Teknoloji and eBay, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81934
SUMMARY

Redis contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the 'tlsProcessPendingData()' function, which handles the TLS pending-data list if Redis is configured with TLS support. A remote, unauthenticated attacker may be able to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the Redis server. Fixed in Redis 8.2.9, 8.4.6, 8.6.6, 8.8.2, and 8.10.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-81931
SUMMARY

Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type in the product photo upload in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.16.0 allows an authenticated user holding the create product permission (routine Seller role) to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the application origin. The photo validation rule classifies the file only by its content (magic bytes) and rejects only a fixed list of PHP extensions, while ProductSaveController::save() names the stored file using the client-supplied extension and copies it into the public web root. A file that begins with an image header and carries an HTML extension passes validation, is stored under public/asset/upload/product/, and is served with a text/html content type, turning the upload into first-party stored script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-81893
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in gdk-pixbuf. When loading a specially crafted JPEG image containing chunked ICC profile markers, an error during ICC profile parsing can leave stale size metadata after the profile buffer is freed. A subsequent allocation in the same decode can cause an out-of-bounds write, potentially crashing the application. To exploit this flaw, an application using gdk-pixbuf must process the malicious JPEG image. Affected version >= 2.26.4

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-81838
SUMMARY

A relative path traversal issue in the zip extraction functionality in AWS diagram-as-code (awsdac) in versions 0.10 through 0.23 can allow a third party to write arbitrary files to the local filesystem via crafted zip entry names containing path traversal sequences. This could allow the third party to perform inappropriate actions in the diagram bundle. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to the version 0.24 or later.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-81834
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in RooCodeInc Roo-Code up to 3.51.1. Affected by this issue is the function ExecaTerminalProcess of the component README File Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Multiple isses were reported to the vendor beforehand. They explain, that "they all apply to Roo Code, a project we no longer support - the repository was archived a while ago, and we don't encourage anyone to use it." This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8