Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.)Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.)
VS
SutherlandSutherland
Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.)

Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.)

Bangalore, 560008, IN

Last Update: 23/06/2026

View Profile
738/1000Moderate

Cyber Security scenario had changed dramatically in India in the recent past where Indian Cyber Security Solutions as an organization caters to the need of technology based risk management & cyber security solution in India. By this time it has gathered a good deal of m...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:94
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Sutherland

Sutherland

1160 Pittsford-Victor Road, Pittsford (Rochester), NY, US, 14534

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
766/1000Fair

Artificial Intelligence. Automation. Cloud Engineering. Advanced Analytics. For Enterprises, these are key factors of success. For us, they’re our core expertise. We work with global iconic brands. We bring them a unique value proposition through market-leading techn...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:64,566
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.)

Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sutherland

Sutherland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) has 33.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sutherland in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sutherland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sutherland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.)

Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
IND1782246360
Sutherland

Sutherland

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SUT000031025

FAQ

Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) company and Sutherland company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) company and Sutherland company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) company and Sutherland company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) company and Sutherland company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) company and Sutherland company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) company and Sutherland company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) company and Sutherland company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) company and Sutherland company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) company and Sutherland company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) company and Sutherland company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) company and Sutherland company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) and Sutherland, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) and Sutherland, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) or Sutherland ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) or Sutherland ?
Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) and Sutherland, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Indian Cyber Security Solutions (CyberSecOps Pvt.Ltd.) and Sutherland, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA