Comparison Overview

Indian Army

VS

General Dynamics

Indian Army

IN, 110022
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://onlinecareer360.com/

The Indian Army is the largest branch of the Indian Armed Forces and is responsible for land-based military operations. Its primary mission is the National Security and Defense of India from external aggression and threats, and maintaining peace and security within its borders. It also conducts humanitarian rescue operations during natural calamities and other disturbances. The Indian Army is one of the three services under the Ministry of Defence. The President of India is the Commander-in-Chief of the Indian Armed Forces, and thus of the Indian Army. The highest ranking military officer is the Chief of Army Staff (COAS), who is also a member of the Chiefs of Staff Committee. The Indian Army came into being at the Independence of India in 1947, and inherited most of the regiments and infrastructure of the British Indian Army that were located in post-partition India.

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 32,762
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

General Dynamics

11011 Sunset Hills Rd, Reston, Virginia, US, 20190
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.generaldynamics.com

From Gulfstream business jets and combat vehicles to nuclear-powered submarines and communications systems, people around the world depend on our products and services for their safety and security. General Dynamics is headquartered in Reston, Virginia, and employs over 100,000 people in 43 countries around the world. At the heart of our company are our employees. We rely on their intimate knowledge of customer requirements and a unique blend of skill and innovation to develop and produce the best possible products and services. The driver that makes our company agile, and ensures our continued performance, is our culture of continuous improvement. This culture enforces a shared commitment to consistently look toward the future and to embrace change. It’s a priority at all levels of our company, with every employee engaged in finding new ways to do things faster, better and more cost-effectively, and push the boundaries of our potential.

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 10,623
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indian-army.jpeg
Indian Army
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-dynamics.jpeg
General Dynamics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Indian Army
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
General Dynamics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indian Army in 2025.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Dynamics in 2025.

Incident History — Indian Army (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indian Army cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — General Dynamics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Dynamics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indian-army.jpeg
Indian Army
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-dynamics.jpeg
General Dynamics
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

General Dynamics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Indian Army company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

General Dynamics company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Indian Army company has not reported any.

In the current year, General Dynamics company and Indian Army company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither General Dynamics company nor Indian Army company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

General Dynamics company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Indian Army company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither General Dynamics company nor Indian Army company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Indian Army company nor General Dynamics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Indian Army nor General Dynamics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Indian Army company nor General Dynamics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Indian Army company employs more people globally than General Dynamics company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Neither Indian Army nor General Dynamics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Indian Army nor General Dynamics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Indian Army nor General Dynamics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Indian Army nor General Dynamics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Indian Army nor General Dynamics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Indian Army nor General Dynamics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References