Comparison Overview

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

VS

YouTube

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

IndiaMART InterMESH Ltd., 6th floor, Tower 2, Assotech Business Cresterra, Noida, UP, 201305, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

IndiaMART is India's largest online B2B marketplace, connecting buyers with suppliers across a wide array of industries. IndiaMART provides a platform for Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs), large enterprises, and individual buyers, helping them access diverse portfolios of quality products. Since 1999, IndiaMART’s mission has been to make doing business easy. Today, over 20.6 Crore buyers can explore and choose from 11.5 Crore products, sourced from 82 Lakh suppliers, creating a one-stop platform for all business needs. IndiaMART offers enhanced business visibility and credibility for suppliers, with tools designed to support business growth and operational efficiency. With a dedicated workforce of over 5000 employees across India, IndiaMART continues to facilitate seamless connections and provide a trusted marketplace for businesses to thrive.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17,538
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

YouTube

901 Cherry Ave., San Bruno, CA, US, 94066
Last Update: 2025-12-16
Between 800 and 849

YouTube is a team-oriented, creative workplace where every single employee has a voice in the choices we make and the features we implement. We work together in small teams to design, develop, and roll out key features and products in very short time frames. Which means something you write today could be seen by millions of viewers tomorrow. And even though we’re a part of Google and enjoy all of the corporate perks, it still feels like you’re working at a startup. YouTube is headquartered in San Bruno, California, 12 miles south of San Francisco. We also have many job openings in Mountain View, and across the globe

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 140,477
Subsidiaries: 46
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indiamart-intermesh-limited.jpeg
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/youtube.jpeg
YouTube
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
YouTube
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IndiaMART InterMESH Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for YouTube in 2025.

Incident History — IndiaMART InterMESH Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — YouTube (X = Date, Y = Severity)

YouTube cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indiamart-intermesh-limited.jpeg
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/youtube.jpeg
YouTube
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Email processing systems, Calendar invitation structures, Document files
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email Spoofing, Messaging Platform (WhatsApp)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Fraudulent Services/Products) or Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Prompt-injection technique through crafted HTML and CSS code
Motivation: Credential theft, social engineering
Blog: Blog

FAQ

YouTube company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

YouTube company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company has not reported any.

In the current year, YouTube company has reported more cyber incidents than IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company.

YouTube company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company has not reported such incidents publicly.

YouTube company has disclosed at least one data breach, while IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company has not reported such incidents publicly.

YouTube company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company has not reported such incidents publicly.

YouTube company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither IndiaMART InterMESH Limited nor YouTube holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

YouTube company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company.

YouTube company employs more people globally than IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither IndiaMART InterMESH Limited nor YouTube holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IndiaMART InterMESH Limited nor YouTube holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IndiaMART InterMESH Limited nor YouTube holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IndiaMART InterMESH Limited nor YouTube holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IndiaMART InterMESH Limited nor YouTube holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IndiaMART InterMESH Limited nor YouTube holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Versions starting with 0.211.0 and prior to 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0 contain a critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in their workflow expression evaluation system. Under certain conditions, expressions supplied by authenticated users during workflow configuration may be evaluated in an execution context that is not sufficiently isolated from the underlying runtime. An authenticated attacker could abuse this behavior to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the n8n process. Successful exploitation may lead to full compromise of the affected instance, including unauthorized access to sensitive data, modification of workflows, and execution of system-level operations. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to a patched version, which introduces additional safeguards to restrict expression evaluation. If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations: Limit workflow creation and editing permissions to fully trusted users only; and/or deploy n8n in a hardened environment with restricted operating system privileges and network access to reduce the impact of potential exploitation. These workarounds do not fully eliminate the risk and should only be used as short-term measures.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

FastAPI Users allows users to quickly add a registration and authentication system to their FastAPI project. Prior to version 15.0.2, the OAuth login state tokens are completely stateless and carry no per-request entropy or any data that could link them to the session that initiated the OAuth flow. `generate_state_token()` is always called with an empty `state_data` dict, so the resulting JWT only contains the fixed audience claim plus an expiration timestamp. On callback, the library merely checks that the JWT verifies under `state_secret` and is unexpired; there is no attempt to match the state value to the browser that initiated the OAuth request, no correlation cookie, and no server-side cache. Any attacker can hit `/authorize`, capture the server-generated state, finish the upstream OAuth flow with their own provider account, and then trick a victim into loading `.../callback?code=<attacker_code>&state=<attacker_state>`. Because the state JWT is valid for any client for \~1 hour, the victim’s browser will complete the flow. This leads to login CSRF. Depending on the app’s logic, the login CSRF can lead to an account takeover of the victim account or to the victim user getting logged in to the attacker's account. Version 15.0.2 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

FileZilla Client 3.63.1 contains a DLL hijacking vulnerability that allows attackers to execute malicious code by placing a crafted TextShaping.dll in the application directory. Attackers can generate a reverse shell payload using msfvenom and replace the missing DLL to achieve remote code execution when the application launches.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LDAP Tool Box Self Service Password 1.5.2 contains a password reset vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate HTTP Host headers during token generation. Attackers can craft malicious password reset requests that generate tokens sent to a controlled server, enabling potential account takeover by intercepting and using stolen reset tokens.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Kimai 1.30.10 contains a SameSite cookie vulnerability that allows attackers to steal user session cookies through malicious exploitation. Attackers can trick victims into executing a crafted PHP script that captures and writes session cookie information to a file, enabling potential session hijacking.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X