Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

InCight, a division of CadentInCight, a division of Cadent
VS
ParexelParexel
InCight, a division of Cadent

InCight, a division of Cadent

N/A

Last Update: 24/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://incight.info/
753/1000Fair

We translate your evidence into impactful and engaging insight-driven Medical Communication plans. Our capabilities include scientific communication platforms, best-in-class peer-reviewed publications, award-winning educational videos, and more.

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Parexel

Parexel

541 Church at North Hills St, 1000, Raleigh, North Carolina, US, 27609

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.parexel.com
794/1000Fair

Parexel is a leading global clinical research organization (CRO) providing insights-driven Clinical and Consulting solutions to the world’s life sciences industry. Leveraging deep local knowledge and a global breadth of clinical, regulatory and therapeutic expertise, ou...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:20,434
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
InCight, a division of Cadent

InCight, a division of Cadent

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Parexel

Parexel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InCight, a division of Cadent in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Parexel in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - InCight, a division of Cadent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InCight, a division of Cadent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Parexel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parexel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
InCight, a division of Cadent

InCight, a division of Cadent

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Parexel

Parexel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ORAPAR1766015901

FAQ

Between InCight, a division of Cadent company and Parexel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between InCight, a division of Cadent company and Parexel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between InCight, a division of Cadent company and Parexel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between InCight, a division of Cadent company and Parexel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between InCight, a division of Cadent company and Parexel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between InCight, a division of Cadent company and Parexel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between InCight, a division of Cadent company and Parexel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between InCight, a division of Cadent company and Parexel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between InCight, a division of Cadent company and Parexel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between InCight, a division of Cadent company and Parexel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between InCight, a division of Cadent company and Parexel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between InCight, a division of Cadent and Parexel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between InCight, a division of Cadent and Parexel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - InCight, a division of Cadent or Parexel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - InCight, a division of Cadent or Parexel ?
Between InCight, a division of Cadent and Parexel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between InCight, a division of Cadent and Parexel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1