Comparison Overview
Institut national de l'audiovisuel
Institut national de l'audiovisuel
4 avenue de l'Europe, Bry-sur-Marne cedex, undefined, 94366, FR
Last Update: 04/11/2025
Entreprise culturelle de l'audiovisuel, l'Ina est chargé depuis 1974 de la conservation, de la valorisation et de la transmission du patrimoine audiovisuel français. L'Ina, c'est également un centre international de formation et de recherche sur les médias et les conte...
MultiChoice Group
144 Braam Fischer, Randburg, Ferndale, Randburg, Gauteng, ZA, 2194
Last Update: 07/09/2026
MultiChoice Group is a leading entertainment company and we’re home to some of the most recognised brands on the continent. Our entertainment platforms – DStv, GOtv, Showmax and DStv Now – are a hub for more than 19 million people across 50 countries. Through Irdeto, we...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Institut national de l'audiovisuel
MultiChoice Group
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Broadcast Media Production and Distribution Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Institut national de l'audiovisuel in 2026.
Incidents vs Broadcast Media Production and Distribution Industry Avg (This Year)
MultiChoice Group has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Institut national de l'audiovisuel (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Institut national de l'audiovisuel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - MultiChoice Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MultiChoice Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Institut national de l'audiovisuel
MultiChoice Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.