Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Imtech Engineering Services CentralImtech Engineering Services Central
VS
Hilti GroupHilti Group
Imtech Engineering Services Central

Imtech Engineering Services Central

Hooton Street, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG3 5GL, GB

Last Update: 17/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.imtech.co.uk
751/1000Fair

Our Engineering Services business stream works across the UK’s built environment via three regional areas; Central, North and London and South. We provide mechanical and electrical installation from initial design through to project completion. Operational excellence...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:116
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hilti Group

Hilti Group

Hilti Aktiengesellschaft, Schaan, 9494, LI

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hilti.group
792/1000Fair

Hilti stands for innovation and direct customer relationships. About 34,000 employees around the world, in more than 120 countries, contribute to making our customers’ work more productive, safer and more sustainable. We do this with our hardware, software and service o...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:28,112
Subsidiaries:42
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Imtech Engineering Services Central

Imtech Engineering Services Central

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hilti Group

Hilti Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imtech Engineering Services Central in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hilti Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Imtech Engineering Services Central (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imtech Engineering Services Central cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hilti Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hilti Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Imtech Engineering Services Central

Imtech Engineering Services Central

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hilti Group

Hilti Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Imtech Engineering Services Central company and Hilti Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Imtech Engineering Services Central company and Hilti Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Imtech Engineering Services Central company and Hilti Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Imtech Engineering Services Central company and Hilti Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Imtech Engineering Services Central company and Hilti Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Imtech Engineering Services Central company and Hilti Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Imtech Engineering Services Central company and Hilti Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Imtech Engineering Services Central company and Hilti Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Imtech Engineering Services Central company and Hilti Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Imtech Engineering Services Central company and Hilti Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Imtech Engineering Services Central company and Hilti Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Imtech Engineering Services Central and Hilti Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Imtech Engineering Services Central and Hilti Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Imtech Engineering Services Central or Hilti Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Imtech Engineering Services Central or Hilti Group ?
Between Imtech Engineering Services Central and Hilti Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Imtech Engineering Services Central and Hilti Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2