Comparison Overview
Imsight Technology

Imsight Technology
No. 12 Science Park West Avenue, Hong Kong Science Park, Sha Tin,, Hong Kong, 852, HK
Last Update: 03/12/2025
Imsight Technology is training AI to analyze medical images for faster and more consistent disease detection using award winning deep-learning techniques. Imsight’s product portfolio tackles a wide variety of medical images from CT, MRI and X-ray to microscopic cell ima...

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, 94043, US
Last Update: 17/06/2026
A problem isn't truly solved until it's solved for all. Googlers build products that help create opportunities for everyone, whether down the street or across the globe. Bring your insight, imagination and a healthy disregard for the impossible. Bring everything that ma...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Imsight Technology













Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Imsight Technology in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Google has 3788.89% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Imsight Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Imsight Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Google (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Google cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Imsight Technology

FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.