Comparison Overview
Impact Observatory
Impact Observatory
Washington, 20008, US
Last Update: 23/06/2026
Impact Observatory is a mission-driven technology company bringing artificial intelligence (AI) powered algorithms and on-demand data to sustainability, environment, and risk analysis for governments, non-profit organizations, companies, and markets. Impact Observatory ...
Lenskart.com
Sector 43, Golf Course Road, GF, Vipul Tech Square, Gurgaon, IN
Last Update: 30/09/2026
At Lenskart, we believe that clear vision is fundamental to the personal development and well-being of an individual, and our aim is to build tech-enabled solutions that improve access to affordable and quality ‘Eyewear for All’. We commenced our operations in India as ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Impact Observatory
Lenskart.com
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
Impact Observatory has 37.89% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lenskart.com in 2026.
Incident History - Impact Observatory (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Impact Observatory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Lenskart.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lenskart.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Impact Observatory
Lenskart.com
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.