Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

iMeshiMesh
VS
DatabricksDatabricks
iMesh

iMesh

US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.imesh.com
799/1000Fair

iMesh is a media and file sharing client that's available in 9 languages. It uses a proprietary, centralized, P2P network (IM2Net) operating on ports 80, 443 and 1863.[1] iMesh is owned by American company iMesh, Inc. and maintains development centers around the world. ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:18
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Databricks

Databricks

160 Spear Street, San Francisco, 94105, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://databricks.com
795/1000Fair

Databricks is the Data and AI company. More than 20,000 organizations worldwide — including adidas, AT&T, Bayer, Block, Mastercard, Rivian, Unilever, and over 60% of the Fortune 500 — rely on Databricks to build and scale data and AI apps, analytics and agents. Headquar...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:17,312
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
iMesh

iMesh

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Databricks

Databricks

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for iMesh in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Databricks in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - iMesh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

iMesh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Databricks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Databricks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
iMesh

iMesh

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
IME33927522
Databricks

Databricks

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between iMesh company and Databricks company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between iMesh company and Databricks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between iMesh company and Databricks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between iMesh company and Databricks company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between iMesh company and Databricks company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between iMesh company and Databricks company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between iMesh company and Databricks company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between iMesh company and Databricks company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between iMesh company and Databricks company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between iMesh company and Databricks company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between iMesh company and Databricks company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between iMesh and Databricks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between iMesh and Databricks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - iMesh or Databricks ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - iMesh or Databricks ?
Between iMesh and Databricks, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between iMesh and Databricks, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES