Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Imdaad GroupImdaad Group
VS
Verzani & SandriniVerzani & Sandrini
Imdaad Group

Imdaad Group

Jebel Ali Freezone, Dubai, 18220, AE

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.imdaad.ae
781/1000Fair

Imdaad, a Dubai-based group of companies, is a regional leader in Integrated Facilities Management (IFM), renowned for its commitment to operational excellence, innovation, and sustainability. Established in 1986, the company is owned by the Investment Corporation of Du...

NAICS:5612
NAICS Definition:Facilities Support Services
Employees:4,700
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Verzani & Sandrini

Verzani & Sandrini

Rua Marina, 487, São Paulo, São Paulo, 09070-510, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.verzani.com.br/
784/1000Fair

Com uma história sólida de sucesso desde sua fundação em 1967, a Verzani & Sandrini se destaca como líder nacional em diversos serviços terceirizados. Presente em todo o Brasil com mais de 71 mil colaboradores, atendemos setores como shopping centers, indústrias, hospi...

NAICS:5612
NAICS Definition:Facilities Support Services
Employees:15,564
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Imdaad Group

Imdaad Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Verzani & Sandrini

Verzani & Sandrini

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imdaad Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Verzani & Sandrini in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Imdaad Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imdaad Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Verzani & Sandrini (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Verzani & Sandrini cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Imdaad Group

Imdaad Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Verzani & Sandrini

Verzani & Sandrini

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Imdaad Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Imdaad Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Imdaad Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Imdaad Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Imdaad Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Imdaad Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Imdaad Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Imdaad Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Imdaad Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Imdaad Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Imdaad Group company and Verzani & Sandrini company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Imdaad Group and Verzani & Sandrini, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Imdaad Group and Verzani & Sandrini, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Imdaad Group or Verzani & Sandrini ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Imdaad Group or Verzani & Sandrini ?
Between Imdaad Group and Verzani & Sandrini, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Imdaad Group and Verzani & Sandrini, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
Imdaad vs Verzani-&-sandrini - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating | Rankiteo