Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
VS
Rutgers UniversityRutgers University
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

King Faisal Road, Dammam, EASTERN, SA

Last Update: 22/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.iau.edu.sa/
789/1000Fair

The legacy of Imam Abdul Rahman bin Faisal University goes back to 1395H (1975G) when it was established as a branch of the King Faisal University in Dammam (KFU-Dammam). After thirty-four years, in September 2009, it became an independent University under the name of ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:7,555
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rutgers University

Rutgers University

57 US Highway 1, New Brunswick, 08901, US

Last Update: 24/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.rutgers.edu
680/1000Weak

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, stands among America’s highest-ranked, most diverse public research universities. The oldest, largest, and top-ranked public university in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan area, you’ll find us at our main locations in thr...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:18,275
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rutgers University

Rutgers University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Rutgers University has 183.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rutgers University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rutgers University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rutgers University

Rutgers University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
INSRUTUDEHARCOL1782312004
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
THEYALRUTHARSTAINSPRI1778258906
🔒 Incident : Breach
MCGVERHARUDE1777034314

FAQ

Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University company and Rutgers University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University company and Rutgers University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University company and Rutgers University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University company and Rutgers University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University company and Rutgers University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University and Rutgers University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University and Rutgers University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University or Rutgers University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University or Rutgers University ?
Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University and Rutgers University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University and Rutgers University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2