Comparison Overview

ImageWorks Corp.

VS

Alcon

ImageWorks Corp.

US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

ImageWorks is a provider of next generation digital imaging solutions for dental applications. We focus on providing not only great image quality, but also a great return on investment.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Alcon

Avenue Louis-Casaï 58, Geneva, Switzerland, 1216, CH
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Alcon helps people see brilliantly. As the global leader in eye care with a heritage spanning over 75 years, we offer the broadest portfolio of products to enhance sight and improve people’s lives. Our Surgical and Vision Care products touch the lives of more than 260 million people in over 140 countries each year living with conditions like cataracts, glaucoma, retinal diseases and refractive errors. Our more than 25,000 associates are enhancing the quality of life through innovative products, partnerships with Eye Care Professionals and programs that advance access to quality eye care. Learn more at www.alcon.com.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 26,196
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
ImageWorks Corp.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alcon.jpeg
Alcon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ImageWorks Corp.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alcon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

ImageWorks Corp. has 8.7% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alcon in 2025.

Incident History — ImageWorks Corp. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ImageWorks Corp. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alcon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alcon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
ImageWorks Corp.
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alcon.jpeg
Alcon
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Alcon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ImageWorks Corp. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ImageWorks Corp. and Alcon have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, ImageWorks Corp. company has reported more cyber incidents than Alcon company.

Neither Alcon company nor ImageWorks Corp. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Alcon company and ImageWorks Corp. company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Alcon company nor ImageWorks Corp. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ImageWorks Corp. company nor Alcon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ImageWorks Corp. nor Alcon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Alcon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ImageWorks Corp. company.

Alcon company employs more people globally than ImageWorks Corp. company, reflecting its scale as a Medical Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither ImageWorks Corp. nor Alcon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ImageWorks Corp. nor Alcon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ImageWorks Corp. nor Alcon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ImageWorks Corp. nor Alcon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ImageWorks Corp. nor Alcon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ImageWorks Corp. nor Alcon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N