Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company)Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company)
VS
SanofiSanofi
Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company)

Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company)

Hazelwood House, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK102XR, GB

Last Update: 27/12/2025

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Illingworth Research Group™, a Syneos Health® company, is a leading provider of clinical research home health services, providing highly trained, qualified and experienced research nurses to the biopharmaceutical and medical device industries. Building on our long-stand...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:224
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sanofi

Sanofi

46 Avenue de la Grande-Armée, Paris, France, FR, 75017

Last Update: 20/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.sanofi.com
824/1000Good

We are an R&D driven, AI-powered biopharma company committed to improving people’s lives and delivering compelling growth. We apply our deep understanding of the immune system to invent medicines and vaccines that treat and protect millions of people around the world,...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:91,571
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company)

Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sanofi

Sanofi

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sanofi in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sanofi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sanofi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company)

Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sanofi

Sanofi

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) company and Sanofi company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) company and Sanofi company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) company and Sanofi company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) company and Sanofi company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) company and Sanofi company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) company and Sanofi company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) company and Sanofi company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) company and Sanofi company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) company and Sanofi company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) company and Sanofi company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) company and Sanofi company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) and Sanofi, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) and Sanofi, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) or Sanofi ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) or Sanofi ?
Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) and Sanofi, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Illingworth Research Group (a Syneos Health Company) and Sanofi, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA